Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
S. M. Kantikar, J
Ashay Shah v. Ireo Grace Realtech Private Limited
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. invoice refund due to possession delays. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contractual obligations in property transactions. (Para 3 , 9) |
| 3. previous rulings influence the current case. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. conditions proof required for consumer status. (Para 11) |
| 5. settlement directives to the builder due to defaults. (Para 12 , 14) |
1. This is a complaint under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 filed by the complainant seeking refund of the amount deposited in respect of the flat booked by them with the opposite parties in a project promoted and developed by the opposite parties along with penal interest and other compensation, alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on account of the delay in handing over possession of the flat.
2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the complainant had booked a flat in the project The Corridors promoted and developed by the Opposite parties viz. Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. located on Golf Course Extension Road, Sector 67 A, Gurgaon, Haryana on 28.2.2013 for their residential purpose. An allotment letter was issued by the opposite party to the complainant on 7.8.2013 allotting flat No. CD - C10 “ 07 - \704 in Tower
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
