SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU
Huluvadi G. Ramesh, President, K.B. Sangannanavar, Judicial Member and M. Divyashree, Lady Member
Branch Manager, M/s. S.B.I.
General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
versus
Syed Hameed Husseni
S/o Syed Husseni – Respondent
Appeal No.11 of 2018
Decided on 4.1.2023

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sri. Prasanth Pandith, Advocate
For the Respondent:Sri. N.P. Singri, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
Surveyor’s report - The surveyors are appointed under the Insurance Act and their report cannot be brushed aside, without any cogent reasons.

Headnote:

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – S.15 [Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – S.41] – Appeal – Services – Insurance – Accident – Surveyor’s report cannot be – brushed aside without reasons - the surveyors are appointed under the Insurance Act and their report cannot be brushed aside, without any cogent reasons. In fact, surveyor’s report is the main document on which the insurance claim to be settled in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy, since they are to be appointed to assess the actual loss sustained by the vehicle. Thus, without any reasons, the surveyor’s report cannot be discarded. Since the OP/Insurance Company has already paid as per the loss assessed by the surveyor, nothing remains due to pay the complainant – Therefore, impugned order is set aside – Appeal is allowed. [Paras 4 to 6].

Result: Appeal is allowed.

ORDER

Huluvadi G. Ramesh, President—This is an appeal filed U/s. 15 of CPA 1986 by OP/Appellant aggrieved by the order dtd.28.10.2017 passed in CC/63/2016 on the file of Gadag District Forum.

2. The Commission examined the grounds of appeal, impugned order, appeal papers and heard the learned counsels.

3. The facts are, as the accident occurred to the insured vehicle namely the tipper; made a claim for damages to OP; got repaired the said vehicle as per the instructions of OP’s surveyor; are not in dispute. When OP paid only part of actual damages, consumer complaint came to be raised before the Forum below, wherein, OP contested the matter contending that the claim settled as per the report of its surveyor. Forum below enquired into the matter and allowed the complaint in part directing OP to pay the balance amount along with cost and compensation of Rs.12,000/-. Aggrieved by this order, OP come with this appeal, on the ground that the Forum below grossly erred in allowing the complaint by not considering the assessment report of the surveyor.

4. It is found from the impugned order at ink page no. 12, para 5, wherein Commission below recorded its findings as: initially surveyor submits the estimation for the damages caused to the vehicle at Rs.4,80,437/- and later settled only for Rs.1,35,255/- as per final report and in this regard while cross examination by counsel for the Complainant, he had not given valid answer. Further, held the OP deficient in service, since, he had not taken consent Appeal No.11/2018 from the Complainant while settling said amount. This view of the District Forum is not justified, since the surveyors are appointed under the Insurance Act and their report cannot be brushed aside, without any cogent reasons. In fact, surveyor’s report is the main document on which the insurance claim to be settled in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy, since they are to be appointed to assess the actual loss sustained by the vehicle. Hence without any reasons, the surveyor’s report cannot be discarded. Since the OP/Insurance Company has already paid as per the loss assessed by the surveyor, nothing remains due to pay the complainant. With such conclusion, we proceed to allow this appeal. Consequently set aside the order dtd.28.10.2017 passed in CC/63/2016 on the file of Gadag District Forum and as a result dismissed the complaint with no order as to cost.

5. The amount in deposit is directed to be transferred to the District Commission for needful.

6. Notify copy of this Order to the District Commission and parties.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top