SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASH CHANDRA, SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Sherly Vasan – Appellant
Versus
Latha Inamdar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Anjana Chandrashekhar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash, Advocate

ORDER

Sudip Ahluwalia, Member—This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant against Respondent No.1/ Opposite Party No.1 and Respondent No.2/ Opposite Party No.2 challenging the impugned Order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru, in Appeal bearing No. 152 of 2013. Vide such Order, the State Commission had allowed the Appeal while setting aside the Order dated 09.01.2013 passed by the Bangalore IV Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bangalore, in Consumer Case No. 2501/2010.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Complainant is a qualified Clinical and Pathologist who was running a clinical Laboratory namely, ‘Sri Lakshmi Clinical Laboratory’. It was the case of the Complainant that she had undergone Laparotomy for Cystectomy about 5 years earlier and there is a vertical punctured scar. The Complainant had started feeling pain in the abdomen off and on since October, 2009 and in April, 2010, the pain became severe and she therefore approached the Opposite Party No.1, Dr. Smt. Latha Inamdar, a renowned Gynaecologist, running a Nursing Home called ‘Trupti Nursing Home’. The Comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top