SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member
Ashit Baran Chakraborty – Appellant
versus
Kasturba Gandhi Hospital and Ors. – Respondents
Appeal No.74 of 2008
(Against the Order dated 29/11/2007 in Complaint No. 18/2004 of the State Commission West Bengal)
Decided on 1.12.2022

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Rajesh Lathigara, Advocate
For the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3:Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate, Ms. Neeraj Singh, Advocate, Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent Nos.4, 5, 6 and 9:Mr. Partha Sil, Advocate
For the Respondent No.7: (Service refused and deemed to have been served vide order dated 06.08.2014)
For the Respondent Nos.8 and 11: Deleted
For the Respondent No.10: Ex-parte

Headnote:

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 19 [Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Section 51] – Appeal against order of State Commission - Services – Medical Negligence - Not attributable to the present case – The hospital and the doctors are required to exercise sufficient care in treating the patient in all circumstances. However, in an unfortunate case, death may occur. It is necessary that sufficient material or medical evidence should be available before the adjudicating authority to arrive at the conclusion that death is due to medical negligence – On facts, the opinion of NIMHANS, Bangalore, various statements of hospital authorities, there is no negligence or deficiency in service either from the treating doctors or the K. G. Hospital. Thus, it is difficult to attribute medical negligence in the instant case – Appeal dismissed. [Paras 7 to 23].

Result: Appeal dismissed.

ORDER

The instant Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal (for short, the ‘State Commission”) in Complaint Case being S.C. No. 18/O/2004 passed on 29.11.2007, whereby the State Commission dismissed the complaint on ground that the Complainant failed to prove any negligence against the OPs.

Brief facts:-

2. On 30.04.2004 at about 6 AM, the Complainant’s daughter Ms. Antra (for short ‘the patient’) while going to school by an Auto-Rickshaw met with an accident. Immediately she was rushed to emergency at Kasturba Gandhi Hospital (in short, ‘OP-1’). Dr. Subimal Gupta (in short, ‘OP-4’) examined her and shifted to ICU and IV saline was started. The patient vomited twice. It was alleged that the Complainant asked about the seriousness of head injury and if necessary, he wanted to take his daughter to some other hospital for better treatment, but on contrary the OP-4 told that sleeping injection had been given and the patient will be sent for CT Scan to Asansol. As per the advice, for CT Scan, the Complaint took her to Avishkar Diagnostic Centre at Asansol (in short, ‘OP-9’). Patient vomited twice during said period. The CT report was seen by OP-4 and told not to be worry. But on the next day (01.05.2004) morning, the OP-4, based on the condition, told the Complainant to take the patient to another hospital having Neurology Department and on the next morning, the OP-4 told the Complainant to better consult Neuro-surgeon as faculty was not available in the OP-1 hospital. At about 9.30 AM, the condition of patient deteriorated and the Complainant allegedly noticed through ICCU glass that few doctors were busy in massaging chest of his daughter and placed her on the ventilator. The Complainant contacted OP-7, Dr. Anil Kumar Rakshit, who allegedly told that in the CT scan there was clear internal hemorrhage seen. If the patient does not respond within 30 mins, then the chances of survival would be less. Thereafter, on the same day the patient declared dead at 7.00 PM.

3. The Complainant alleged that the CT Scan, PM findings and the death certificate clearly showed head injury and Scalp swelling on left side of occiput. Thus, under such grave condition, the ordinary surgeon (OP-4) ought to have referred the patient, but he treated the patient without any knowledge in neurology and neurosurgery. The patient was 10 years old and only child of the complainant who died due to negligence and lack of due care and treatment from the OPs. Being aggrieved, the father of Child filed the Consumer Complaint before the State Commission, Kolkata and prayed compensation of around 38 lakhs.

Defense:

4. The OPs filed their reply and submitted that the allegations are false and frivolous. The OP-1 and 2 have admitted that in the hospital, there was neither Neurology nor Neurosurgery unit. The Complainant, being a Local Railway employee, working at the Chittaranjan Locomotive works, knew very well that there was no neurosurgeon and no neurology unit in Kasturba Gandhi Hospital, but therein he was willing for treatment under Dr. S. Gupta, the OP-4. The OPs submitted that on 30.04.2004 the patient, was admitted with a trauma to the head and abrasion over both knees and small abrasion over frontal region of skull. There was no history of any unconsciousness, history of vomiting once. The Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) was 15. The patient was admitted and for constant supervision and to avoid disturbance from the attendants, she was kept in ICCU. The CT scan was advised and necessary permission was taken from Chief Medical Superintendent of the hospital who also visited the patient during the routine round. The funduscopic examination was done but there was no papilledema. It was further submitted that the patient’s attendants made their arrangement of their own to take her to Asansol for CT scan. The Complainant gave undertaking for the same on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top