SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
Ram Mangal Sanskrutik Bhavan – Appellant
Versus
Aanand Annasaheb Koli – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anand Landge, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Santosh Tavdare, Advocate and Ms. Arpita Phansalkar, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 21.08.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.A/16/3013 in which order dated 29.09.2016 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolhapur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 121 of 2016 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside impugned order dated 21.08.2018 in Appeal No.A/16/3013.

2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as Petitioner was Appellant and the Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent in the said FA No.A/16/3013 before the State Commission the Revision Petitioner was OP and Respondent was Complainant before the District Forum in the CC No. 121/2016. For the sake of convenience, parties will also be referred to as they were arrayed before the District Forum. N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top