SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
IDBI Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Surjit Kaur – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajive R. Raj and Mr. Pratik Ranjan, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 01.11.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.144 of 2019 in which order dated 28.05.2019 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, U.T. Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 471 of 2018 was challenged, inter alia praying for:—

(i) setting aside/modifying/reversing the order dated 01.11.2019 passed by the State Commission;

(ii) passing directions in favour of the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.17,000/- along with bank interest only for the Bond in question to the Respondent.

2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as Bank) was Appellant and the Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent in the said FA No. 144 of 2019 before the State Commission the Revision Petitioner was OP and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top