SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

INDER JIT SINGH
Purvanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Radhey Shyam – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Anurag Kishore, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosh and Ms. Rupali S Ghosh, Advocates

ORDER

The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioners against Respondent as detailed above, under Section 58(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the order dated 24.08.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 1745 of 2015 in which order dated 25.07.2015 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Varanasi (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no. 06 of 2014 was challenged, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 24.08.2021 of the State Commission.

2. While the Revision Petitioners (hereinafter also referred to as OPs) were Appellants and the Respondent (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent in the said FA No. 1745 of 2015 before the State Commission, the Revision Petitioners were OPs and Respondent was Complainant before the District Forum in the CC no. 06 of 2014.

3. Notice was issued to the Respondents on 06.04.2022. Parties filed Written Arguments/Synopsis on 12.07.2023 and 24.02.2023 respectively.

4. Brief facts of the case, as emerged from the RP, Order of the St

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top