SUBHASH CHANDRA, SADHNA SHANKER
Krishna Chaudhuri – Appellant
Versus
Ansal Properties – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. Sadhna Shanker, Member—The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short “the Act”) in challenge to the Order dated 08.11.2019 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Complaint No. 382 of 2019 whereby the complaint of the complainant was partly accepted.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainants’) and the learned counsel for the respondents (hereinafter referred to as the ‘builder company’) and perused the record including the State Commission’s impugned Order dated 08.11.2019 and the memorandum of appeal.
3. The brief facts are that the builder company had entered into an agreement with Sh. Ram Niwas Sharma son of Jaggi Dutt and Sh. Lalit Kumar Vashisht son of Sh. Ram Niwas Sharma, residents of H. No.1357, old no. 560, New Railway Road, Dayanand Colony, Gurgaon whereby Sh. Ram Niwas Sharma and Sh. Lalit Kumar Vashishisht were allotted the apartment no. 04 on 04th floor in Tower No. 26 having a super area of approximately 119 sq. mt. (1275 sq. ft.) in the proposed Group Housing Complex of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.