SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SRIRANGA RAO, R. S. RAJESHREE
Kummari Roddalla Rajavva – Appellant
Versus
Superintending Engineer (Operations) – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants: Smt. K.R. Rajavva (PIP)
For the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: M/s. Zakir Ali Danish

ORDER

Sriranga Rao, Member (M-J).—This appeal is filed by the Appellants/Complainants No. 1 to 4 U/s. 15 of C.P. Act, 1986, praying this Commission to allow this appeal by setting aside the impugned order dt.31.07.2018 passed in CC.No.29/2014 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nizamabad and consequently to allow the complaint as prayed for.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the complaint. The Appellants No.1 to 4 in this appeal were Complainants Nos.1 to 4 and the Respondents No.1 & 2 were Opposite Parties No.1 & 2 in CC No.29/2014 before the District Forum, Nizamabad.

3. The brief facts of the case of the Complainants No.1 to 4 as per the averments of the complaint are as follows:-

The complainants submit that their family is eking livelihood on agriculture by cultivating their small land holding. The husband of the first Complainant Kummari Roddalla Rajaiah, Aged 38 years met with fatal electrical accident due to loose and hung live electrical wire and died on the spot due to “Electrocution” on 24.09.2010 at his agricultural field. The victim is the consumer/customer of the Opposite Parties No.1 & 2 vide agricultural serv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top