SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANOJIT MANDAL
Belle Vue Clinic – Appellant
Versus
Pramila Poddar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner No.1:Srijan Nayak, Advocate
For the Respondents: None appears

JUDGMENT

Manojit Mandal, President.—This revision petition is at the instance of the revisionist/ petitioner and is directed against the order No. 15 dated 23/07/2024 passed by the Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata, Unit-II ( in short, ‘the District Commission’) in connection with M.A. No. 579 of 2022 arising out of complaint case No. CC/90/2022 whereby the Learned District Commission was pleased to reject the maintainability application.

2. The respondents being the complainants filed a petition of complaint before the Learned District Commission being No. CC/90/2022 praying for the following reliefs :-

“A) Pecuniary Damage

a) Rs.19,36,286 (Rupees Nineteen Lac Thirty Six Thousand Two Hundred Eighty Six) only towards the cost of treatment with OP No. 1 Hospital to be returned with interest by the Opposite parties.

b) Rs.47,88,000.00 (Rupees Forty Seven Lac Eighty Eight Thousand only) towards loss of prospective / future earning of the victim SANJAY SINGH aged 51 years up to 70 years (life expectancy) over a period of 19 years @Rs.30,000.00 per month on an average (Rs.30000 x 12 x 19-30%) = Rs.47,88,000/-.

B) For Non Pecuniary damages towards :

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top