SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MEENA RAMANATHAN, V. V. SESHUBABU
S. Ram Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Boosa Mallaiah – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: M/s Gouri Sankara Rao
For the Respondent: M/s J. Venkat Reddy

ORDER

Meena Ramanathan, i/c President.—The appeal is filed u/s 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Opposite Party, aggrieved by the order of District Consumer Commission, Karimnagar, dated 25.10.2019 in CC 204/2006, where under the opposite party was directed to pay Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of complaint till realization and costs of Rs.5,000/- within one month from the date of receipt of the order.

2. The brief averments of the complaint in CC 204/2006 are that the opposite party is running the hospital by name “Seva Sankalp Kidney” Hospital, Karimnagar and on 04.11.2004 due to stomach pain, the complainant went there; that after conducting medical tests, he was advised to undergo removal of kidney stones. On 05.11.2004, the complainant deposited Rs.6,000/- and on the same day operation was conducted; that the wife of the complainant was informed by the opposite party that some mistake has occurred in performing the operation and so advised to shift the patient (complainant) to Hyderabad to save the life and immediately, the complainant was shifted to NIMS, Hyderabad, where he was operated upon 08.11.2014 and discharged on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top