SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GAUTAM CHOURDIYA, PRAMOD KUMAR VARMA
Dileshwar Verma – Appellant
Versus
Sona Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shri Sudeep Johri, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Rajesh Verma, Advocate

ORDER

Gautam Chourdiya, President.—This order will govern disposal of all the above three appeals filed under section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 (hereinafter called “the Act” for short) arising out of separate impugned orders passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajnandgaon (hereinafter called “District Commission” for short) by which the District Commission partly allowed the complaints and directed the opposite party/appellant to pay compensation as under:—

Sr. No.

Appeal No.

Complaint Case No.

Date of Impugned Order

The opposite party/appellant was directed to pay

1

FA/24/87

CC/21/119

27.12.2023

Medical expenses of Rs.1,79,990/-, compensation for physical, mental and financial loss Rs.20,000/- and cost of litigation Rs.3,000/-. All above amount was directed to be paid with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing complaint 08.02.2021 till realization. If the opposite party/appellant fails to pay the above amount within 60 days, the interest was directed to be paid @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing complaint 08.02.2021.

2

FA/24/88

CC/21/118

27.12.2023

Medical expenses of Rs.2,08,931/-,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top