SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MEENA RAMANATHAN, K. RANGA RAO
Foreman, M/s Akshara Chit Fund Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ramreddy Sujatha Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: M/s N. Amarnath
For the Respondent: M/s Vijender Reddy

ORDER :

K. Ranga Rao, Member – Judicial—The appeal is filed by the Appellant/Opposite Party u/s 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, against the order passed by the District Consumer Commission, Warangal, dated 31.05.2022 in CC No.56/2021, with a prayer to set aside the said order and consequently dismiss the complaint.

2. For the sake of convenient discussion, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the complaint. The Respondent was the complainant and the appellant herein was the opposite party in the said CC 56/2021.

3. The factual matrix of the complaint is that the complainant had joined as a Member in the opposite party Chit Fund Company vide Chit No. AKZT02S-30 and the chit value is Rs.25,00,000/- payable in 50 monthly installments @ Rs.50,000/- per month. The complainant submits that she had paid 38 installments to the opposite party and participated in the auction conducted on 24.08.2019 conducted by the opposite party and became the successful bidder by foregoing an amount of Rs.4,50,000/-. The opposite party requested the complainant to furnish the sureties, but the complainant instructed the opposite party to deduct the future installments and to pay the remaining

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top