SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Guj) 36

T.U.MEHTA
KEVALDAS KALABHAI – Appellant
Versus
CHAMPAKLAL CHIMANLAL SODAGAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: KUSUM M.SHAH, N.S.PARGHI

T. U. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Appeal arises out of the order passed by the 8 Judge of the City Civil Court Ahmedabad dismissing the execution application No. 237/64 filed by the appellant who is the decree-holder. The execution in question is of a decree passed by the High Court of Bombay on its Original Side for the sum of Rs. 19 770 with interest and costs in Civil Suit No. 674/47 which was for the amount of Rs. 13 210 The said decree is passed on 16th March 1951 The same was transferred by the High Court of Bombay to City Civil Court Ahmedabad for execution and pursuant to that order of transfer the appellant-decree holder has filed this execution application in the City Civil Court Ahmedabad on 28 April 1964 The total amount for the realisation of which the execution is filed comes to Rs. 30 270 nps. During the course of the execution the decree holder has taken into attachment the judgment debtors immoveable property situated at Kalupur in the city of Ahmedabad.

( 2 ) TO this execution application judgment-debtors who are respondants in this appeal have taken various objections. Their main contention is that the High Court of Bombay had no jurisdiction to pass any decree against t
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top