SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Guj) 45

J.M.SHETH
BIPINCHANDRA PURSHOTTAMDAS PATEL – Appellant
Versus
JASHWANT LALBHAI NAIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.K.TAKVANI, I.M.NANAVATI, N.R.OZA

J. M. SHETH, J.

( 1 ) FIRST Appeal No. 90 of 1973 has been filed by the appellants who were alongwith respondent No. 1. trustees of the trust known as Shri Sanskar Bharati Trust which was registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act 1950 (which will be hereinafter referred to as the Act ). against the order passed by the learned District Judge Bulsar at Navsari in Civil Miscallaneous Application No. 23 of 1969 filed by them under sec. 28 of the Act against the order passed by the learned Charity Commissioner in suo motu scheme proceeding No. 31 of 1966 framing the scheme for the trust in question. The learned District Judge has dismissed the aforasaid civil application filed by the applicants under sec. 72 of the Act. Respondent No. 2 is the Charity Commissioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

( 2 ) MR. I. M. Nanavati appearing for the appellants made the following submissions: (1) On a true interpretation of sec. 50-A of the Act the Charity Commissioner has jurisdiction to frame a scheme only in a case where a trust exists but there is no scheme for its administration. (2) Even if the power under sec. 50-A of the Act can be exercised despite a scheme being in existence for































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top