S.OBUL REDDY, J.B.MEHTA, B.K.MEHTA
DUNGARLAL HARICHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Special Civil Application has been referred to a Full Bench by a Division Bench consisting of P. N. Bhagwati C. J. (as he then was) and M. U. Shah J. as in their opinion the two decisions rendered by this Court in KAUSHIKPRASAD V. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (1970) 11 G. L. R. 993 AND MOHANLAL JESINGBHAI V. P. J. PATEL (1970) 11 G. L. R. 1035 to which one of them (Bhagwati C. J.) was a party required reconsideration as the attention of the Court was not drawn to certain provisions and particularly sec. 56 of the Bombay Town Planning Act which seemed to suggest that the view taken by them may not be correct.
( 2 ) THE relevant facts leading to the filing of this petition may briefly be stated The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation by a notification dated July 19 1951 declared its intention to make a Town Planning Scheme under sub-sec. (1) of sec. 9 of Bombay Town Planning Act 1915 in respect of the area of land shown in Plan No. 40 marked and verged blue dated July 12 1951 By this notification the Corporation invited objections or suggestions from any person likely to be affected by the Scheme with respect to the declaration. On
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.