Gujarat High Court
Judgename :B.K.MEHTA, J.B.MEHTA, S.OBUL REDDY
DUNGARLAL HARICHAND - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
S.C.A. 1663 of 1970
Decided On : 08/04/1976
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14 19, 21, 226 and 133 - Bombay Town Planning Act, 1915 - Sections 9, 56, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 58 and 90 - Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 51 and 4 - Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Section 3 - Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1973 - Sections 14, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 33, 34, 51 and 43 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 188 - Housing Act, 1925 - Section 35 - Companies Act - Section 457 - Unconstitutional and ultra vires - Permanently fastened - Resolution it was also pointed out by Government that no objections or suggestions to making of said Scheme have been received by Government from any person likely to be affected by said Scheme - Government in exercise of its powers conferred by sec of Act was pleased to sanction making of such scheme subject to condition that lands situated within red line verge on said plan should be excluded from said scheme - Draft scheme was notified on Municipal corporation and it recited that draft Town Planning Scheme was prepared and published for inspection – Held, combined reading makes it clear that such of the persons who communicate their objections in writing under sub-rule (3) are to be afforded sufficient opportunity of stating their views and no decision shall be given until representations made by or objections raised by the persons affected are duly and properly considered by the Town Planning Officer - It is only an additional opportunity prescribed to ensure a proper and fair hearing being given to the persons affected at the stage - Hold that two decisions referred were wrongly decided only to extent that a right to individual notice is held to be so mandatory as to have a nullifying consequence – Court hold that old sub-rule are merely additional procedural safeguards and not essential minimum requirements - When petitioner without any right after this finally sanctioned scheme under which all his rights are extinguished remains in occupation all these years only because of our stay order we cannot further continue relief any longer as requested and interim relief is therefore forthwith vacated – Order accordingly
( 1 ) THIS Special Civil Application has been referred to a Full Bench by a Division Bench consisting of P. N. Bhagwati C. J. (as he then was) and M. U. Shah J. as in their opinion the two decisions rendered by this Court in KAUSHIKPRASAD V. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (1970) 11 G. L. R. 993 AND MOHANLAL JESINGBHAI V. P. J. PATEL (1970) 11 G. L. R. 1035 to which one of them (Bhagwati C. J.) was a party required reconsideration as the attention of the Court was not drawn to certain provisions and particularly sec. 56 of the Bombay Town Planning Act which seemed to suggest that the view taken by them may not be correct.
( 2 ) THE relevant facts leading to the filing of this petition may briefly be stated The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation by a notification dated July 19 1951 declared its intention to make a Town Planning Scheme under sub-sec. (1) of sec. 9 of Bombay Town Planning Act 1915 in respect of the area of land shown in Plan No. 40 marked and verged blue dated July 12 1951 By this notification the Corporation invited objections or suggestions from any person likely to be affected by the Scheme with respect to the declaration. One months time was given to enable persons likely to be affected to file their objections before the Municipal Commissioner. Subsequent to that notification the Government of Bombay by Resolution of March 9 1953 sanctioned making of the Town Planning Scheme to be called the Town Planning Scheme Ahmedabad No. 16 in respect of the area of land shown in blue verge on the plan No. 40 dated July 12 1951 which was sent to the Government and which was open to the inspection of the public during office hours of the Corporation. In this Resolution it was also pointed out by the Government that no objections or suggestions to the making of the said Scheme have been received by the Government from any person likely to be affected by the said Scheme. The Government in exercise of its powers conferred by subsec. (6) of sec. 9 of the Act was pleased to sanction the making of such scheme subject to the condition that the lands situated within the red line verge on the said plan should be excluded from the said scheme. The draft scheme was notified on December 2 1954 by the Ahmedabad Municipal corporation and it recited that the draft Town Planning Scheme Ahmedabad No. 16 was prepared and published for inspection. In this publication too the Municipal Commissioner invited objections to the draft scheme from any person affected by such scheme for consideration of the Local Authority. The draft Scheme was approved by the Government of Bombay by its Resolution of November 8 1956 and the Arbitrator was appointed by notification of February 20 1957 Finally the Government of Gujarat the successor Government to the Government of Bombay published the notification dated June 10 1970 under the Bombay Town Planning Act 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the new Act ). The Government of Gujarat in exercise of the powers conferred by sec. 51 of the new Act sanctioned the final scheme subject 10 the modifications enumerated in the Schedule appended thereto. The Scheme was directed to be kept open for inspection by the public at the office of the Municipal Corporation for the City of Ahmedabad during office hours on all working days. The Government also fixed the first day of September 1970 as the date on which all the liabilities created by the Scheme shall take effect and the final scheme shall come into force. As a result of the publication of the final scheme by the Government the Corporation informed the Saraspur Mills the owner of the premises bearing Municipal Census No. 365/9 to handover possession of the same. That led to the Saraspur Mills Limited writing to the petitioner its tenant informing him of the notice issued by the Municipal Corporation and requiring him to vacate the premises so as to enable the Municipal Corporation to take possession. It is this letter of the o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.