SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Guj) 109

A.M.AHMADI
MIYA MOHAMED ABDULKARIM JARIWALA – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF SURAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.PANCHAL, R.K.ABICHANDANI, R.M.CHRISTIE

A. M. AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) THERE is a plot of land bearing old survey No. 6and new survey no. 3141 in ward no 3 of Surat city admeasuring about 2518 sq. yds. The appellant no. 1 had made an application dt. June 1 1962 under sec. 18 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to the Assistant Charity Commissioner Surat for registration of public trust namely Sarvajanik Jmumasha Kabrastan. In the said application appellants nos. 2 and 3 were shown to be the trustees of the said trust and the mode of succession to trusteeship was by appointment from the residents of three localities of Surat namely Ambawadi Kalipul Ambawadi Ghadewans Takra and Ambawadi Saiyed Badarmiyas Moholla. The aforesaid plot of land bearing old s. no. 6 and new s. no. 3141 admeasuring about 2518 sq. yds. had been shown to be the property of the said public trust. It was averred in the application that the said property was being used as a burial ground by the Musalmans residing in the aforesaid three localities since time immemorial. The extract from the property card was produced along with the application wherein the name of the owner was shown to be the Surat Municipal Corporation. An













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top