SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Guj) 114

B.J.DIVAN, B.K.MEHTA
RAVJIBHAI BHIKHABHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF OFFICER,bilimora NAGAR PALIKA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.L.PATEL, HARUBHAI MEHTA

B. K. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) SINCE in these two applications the elections of Bilimora Municipality and Bulsar Municipality held in October 1980 have been challenged mainly on the ground of breach of the relevant provisions of the Gujarat Municipalities Act 1963 or the Gujarat Municipalities Election Rules 1964 pertaining to the preparation of electoral rolls we intend to dispose of these two applications by this common order. Before we address ourselves to the contentions urged by the respective petitioners it would be profitable to set out a few relevant facts of both these applications so that the contentions can be appreciated in proper context.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS of Special Civil Application No. 2964/80 are the defeated candidates in the selections of Bilimora Municipality and they seek to challenge the elections to wards Nos. 2 6 7 8 and 9 of the said Municipality. Respondents Nos. 4 to 6 are elected candidates from ward No. 2; respondents Nos. 7 to 9 are elected from ward No. 6; respondents Nos. 10 and 11 are elected from ward No. 7; respondents Nos. 12 to 14 are elected from ward No. 8 and respondents Nos. 15 to 17 are elected from wax No. 9. It should be stated that respondent No.
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top