( 1 ) THOUGH the impugned selection is challenged in the petition on several grounds only three grounds were pressed for my consideration during the course of hearing. Those grounds are as follows : (2) The selection is vitiated on account of substantive and procedural unfairness arbitrariness and unreasonableness as well as non-application of mind and casualness; more particularly the proceedings of the Selection Committee are vitiated because: (a) no norms or guidelines were laid down for judging the performance of the candidate at the interview and for evaluating his service record; (b) the relative weightage to be given to the performance at the interview and the assessment based on service record was not decided upon; (c) no rational and equitable formula for assessment and quantification of marks was adopted; (d) the relevant and adequate material relating to each candidate was not available for making a just assessment; (e) at the interview which lasted for hardly three or four minutes no relevant questions were put which might have a bearing on judging the suitability of the candidate on the basis of the viva voce test; (f) all the members of the Selection C