SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Guj) 224

V.V.BEDARKAR
SURESHBHAI K. DESAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, ARUN H.MEHTA, B.R.PATEL

V. V. BEDARKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed against the order of the learned Sessions Judge Valsad at Navsari in Criminal Revision Application No 32 of 1979. Condoning the delay in filing the chargesheet against the petitioner and setting aside the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Umbergaon in Criminal Case No. 656 of 1978 which was to the effect that as the chargesheet was presented beyond the period of limitation the chargesheet was ordered to be filed and the process issued against the accused was quashed.

( 2 ) SO far as the facts are concerned they are not disputed and averments are made to that effect in this revision petition also. It is a fact that the petitioneraccused for the commission of offences punishable under sec. 66 (1) (b) and sec. 85 (1) and (2) of the Bombay Prohibition Act 1947 and sec. 110 of the Bombay Police Act 1951 The accused was arrested at about 9. 30 p. m. on 17-12-1976 on suspicion of having consumed alcohol. Blood sample was taken on that very day by the Medical Officer who clinically examined him. The blood sample was sent to the Chemical Analyser on 18-12-1976 and as per the averment in the petition as well as in the orders o






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top