SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Guj) 185

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :S.B.MAJMUDAR
JAYESH A.JOSHIPURA - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
S.C.A. 3032 of 1982
Decided On : 10/09/1983

Advocates Appeared: B.P.TANNA, M.A.BUKHARI

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 225, 14, 226 and 15 – Admission - Higher secondary examination - Challenged action of respondents in not considering case of Petitioner for being admitted to who is dean of medical college has taken view that petitioner is not Eligible to be considered for admission to said course in view of rule I of rules for admission to first course at and government medical colleges as petitioner cannot be said to have passed qualifying examination for admission to concerned course as defined by said rule - Petition was admitted to final hearing last year and Rule was made returnable who appeared for respondents at that stage conceded that if there was one vacancy existing in concerned first course it would be kept vacant - I am told that said order was continued thereafter till final disposal of this petition – Held, This is also a question of policy decision and whether suggested modality would be better or present policy decision reflected by impugned rule is better is for executive to decide - Courts limited function is to test impugned decision on touch stone of Constitution and if impugned decision escapes unscathed matter must end so far as court proceedings are concerned - Hence this grievance cannot be of any real assistance to petitioner - THESE were only contentions raised for petitioner and as there is no substance in any one of them inevitable result is that petition fails Rule issued therein is discharged - In view of facts and circumstances of case there will be no order as to costs - Petition dismissed.

S. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition under Article 225 of the Constitution read with Article 14 thereof the petitioner who has passed higher secondary examination conducted by the Gujarat Secondary Education Board has challenged the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for being admitted to 1st M. B. B. S. course conducted at B. J. Medical College Ahmedabad from June 1982. Respondent No. 3 who is the dean of the medical college has taken the view that the petitioner is not Eligible to be considered for admission to the said course in view of rule I of the rules for admission to first M. B. B. S. course and 1st B. D. S. course at andgovernment medical colleges as the petitioner cannot be said to have passed the qualifying examination for admission to the concerned course as defined by the said rule.

( 2 ) IN order to highlight the grievance of the petitioner in this petition a few relevant facts must be noted at the outset. The petitioner has passed the higher secondary examination taken by the Gujarat Higher Secondary Education Board in April 1981 from science stream. His result was declared in July 1981 and he secured 511 out of 800 marks which amounted to 71% For the purpose of admission to 1st M. B. B. S. course the marks in theory of Physics Chemistry and biology and marks of mathematics are taken into consideration. In these papers the petitioner secured 330 marks out of 450 which amounted to 73%. On the basis of the aforesaid result the petitioner made application for joining medical course July 1981. But because there were more candidates above him and as admissions were closed at higher percentage of marks obtained by the concerned applications for the said course in July 1981 the petitioner could not get admission in the medical course in July 1981 the petitioner again applied for being admitted to the medical course starting from July 1982 that is-next year. But in view of the fact that rule 1 of rules rules for admission to first M. B. B. S. course or first B. D. S. course at Government colleges as framed by respondent No. 1 restricted the entries to medical course beginning examination i e. Gujarat Higher Secondary Examination in either April -May 1982 or earliest in October 1981 the petitioner who had passed the said examination prior to October 1981 was not found eligible to apply for admission such to the medical course begining in July 1982. As per the admission rule before a candidate could be held eligible to apply for admission to such a course he had to pass the qualifying examination for admission as conducted by the Gujarat Secondary Education Board in March/april of the current year (i. e. the year in which the concerned course started) or in October/november of the preceding year. According to the aforesaid rule therefore the student who has passed the qualifying examination i. e. higher secondary certificate examination in science stream in March/april 1982 or at the earliest October/november 1981 could apply for admission to the first M. B. B. S. course that was to start from July 1982. As the petitioner has passed the said examination in April 1981 in the light of the rule and the definition of qualifying examination therein the petitioners case was kept out of consideration. It is in these circumstances that the petitioner is driven to file the present petition. His main grievance is that rule 1 of the rules for admission as framed by way of executive instructions by respondent No. I and which has defined qualifying examination by restricting it to only two examinations one in the current year and only one examination in the previous year is highly discriminatory and violative of the guarantee of Article 14 of the Constitution as by the said rule equals are treated inequally. That the qualifying examination for admission to 1 M. B. B. S course is higher standard certificate examination science stream. All students who have passed the said examination in the pas


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top