SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 194

A.P.RAVANI
AMBUBHAI and DIWANJI – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT MAZDOOR PANCHAYAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.P.TANNA, MAHESH C.BHATT

A. P. RAVANI, J.

( 1 ) IN the conflict between labour and management where Workers resort to demonstration slogan-shouting satyagrahas go-slow and even strikes in order to bring pressure upon the employer so that the demands made by them be accepted by the employer would it be wise and prudent for the Civil Court to intervene and grant injunction in favour of employer and restrain the workmen from resorting to demonstration slogan-shouting etc. ? In such type of conflicts there is no undisputed right of either party hence would it not amount to taking side with a party which may even impair the image of the Court? What should be the relevant considerations while deciding the question of grant or refusal of injunction in the matters connected with labour disputes? These are some of the important questions which have surfaced in this appeal from order. 1 A. The appellant-plaintiff is a firm of advocates and solicitors practising their profession of law as such. The defendants Nos. 2 to 12 are the employees of the plaintiff-firm and defendant No. 1 is a trade union registered under the provisions of the trade Unions Act 1926

( 2 ) THIS appeal arises out of an order passed by the City Ci































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top