SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Guj) 77

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :S.A.SHAH
Shrivas Rajeshkumar - Appellant
Versus
Chairman, Selection Committee - Respondent
S.C.A. 31 of 1986
Decided On : 06/17/1986

Advocates Appeared: A.G.MOMIN, M.A.MALIK

Headnote:

Constitution of India, Art. 15 (4) and Art. 16 (4) - Admission – Reservation Quota - Petitioner averred that he belongs to Hindu Community which is recognized as Class by Commission - He has further averred that after the interview he was given admission in the Instrumentation and Control Branch in Bhavnagar College reserved quota percent - Thereafter when he went to pay his fees told him that he belongs Uttar Pradesh therefore he is not entitled to get admission reserved quota Instrumentation and Control Course and therefore he was required to clarify position and his admission was kept pending - Ultimately petitioner tried to approach concerned authorities but could not succeed and therefore he has filed this petition - Held, Supreme Court in case of Union of India, question of is not very material but only thing that has some connection or bearing with issue is as to what was permanent residence petitioner - It is proved beyond doubt family of great-grandfather petitioner had migrated and thereafter petitioners grandfather had settled in Gujarat since last had opened a Barbers shop in and is at present also having said shop petitioners father is in Government service and petitioner has taken his education - It cannot therefore be disputed that petitioner belongs to Gujarat - Even if great grandfather petitioner had migrated to which might origin family since last three generations petitioners family is residing in Gujarat and has merged with mainstream of Gujarat people and culture and therefore benefits Government Resolution cannot be denied petitioner - State of mind or animus which is required demands that person whose object inquiry should have formed a fixed and settled purpose of making his principal or sole permanent home country of residence effect should have formed a deliberate intention to settle there - Petition allowed

S. A. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) ORDER :- The petitioner who has passed the Higher Secondary Examination (Standard XII) with Science Stream in the month of March 1985 has filed this petition and prayed for a writ and/or direction or order directing the respondents to give admission to the petitioner for Instrumentation and Control Branch in the reserved quota reserved for Socially and Educationally Backward Class (hereinafter referred to as s. E. B. Class ). The petition has been subsequently amended and a further prayer has been made for a writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside the order dt. 23-1-1986 (Annexure h) whereby respondent No. 3 has held that the petitioner did not belong to S. E. B. Class and, therefore, cancelled the certificate (Annexure a) issued by the Social Welfare Officer, Ahmedabad District.

( 2 ) THERE is no dispute that if the petitioner is found to belong to the S. E. B. Class, he will get admission in the reserved quota for Instrumentation and Control Course at Bhavnagar for which he has shown his first preference. The question that arises for my consideration, therefore, is whether the benefit of S. E. B. Class/caste is available to the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the case.

( 3 ) IN order to decide this issue, it is necessary to reproduce short facts. The petitioner has averred that he belongs to Hindu Nai Community which is recognised as S. E. B. Class by the Baxi Commission. On the aforesaid basis the petitioner applied for admission in the Instrumentation and Control Branch of Engineering on 17-1-1985 and has produced along with his admission application a Certificate dt. 16-1-1986 (Annexure a) issued by the Social Welfare Officer, Ahmedabad District, to the effect that petitioner Shri Rajendrakumar, son of Shrinivas Satyanarayan, belongs to S. E. B. Class. The petitioner was called for interview on 27-12-1985. According to the petitioner, he was given merit number for various groups mentioned in paragraph 3 of the petition. He has further averred that after the interview he was given admission in the Instrumentation and Control Branch in Bhavnagar College in the reserved quota of 10 per cent. Thereafter, when he went to pay his fees, respondent No. 1 told him that he belongs to Uttar Pradesh and, therefore, he is not entitled to get admission in the reserved quota for the Instrumentation and Control Course and, therefore, he was required to clarify the position and his admission was kept pending. Ultimately the petitioner tried to approach the concerned authorities, but could not succeed and, therefore, he has filed this petition.

( 4 ) DURING the pendency of this petition, by an order dt. 23-1-1986 (Annexure h) the Director of Social Welfare Department (respondent No. 3) has cancelled the certificate (Annexure a) granted to the petitioner by the Social Welfare Officer. Thereafter the petition was amended and certain facts were brought on record, by the petitioner. In the amendment, the petitioner has contended that at entry No. 76 of Annexure i to the Resolution dt. 1-1-1978 (Annexure i to the petition) a class of persons, either Hindus or Muslims, having traditional business of hair cutting, have been accepted by the Bakshi Commission as belonging to S. E. B. Class/caste. The history of the petitioners family, as disclosed in the petition, is that since 1928 to 1934 Lalbahadur (grand father of the present petitioner) and his (Lalbahadurs) father Mathuraprasad were residing and performing their traditional business of Nayi in Ahmedabad. Mathuraprasad died in year 1935 in U. P. and thereafter Lalbahadur came permanently to reside in Ahmedabad with his family in year 1940, and since then he is residing and performing his traditional business in Ahmedabad at No. 3241, Khas Bazaar, opposite Karanj Police Station, Ahmedabad. Municipal tax bills have also been produced. Further fact is that the petitioner and his further and grandfather are domiciled in Ahmedabad. It is not disputed tha














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top