SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Guj) 140

R.A.MEHTA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
MANGAL TRADERS,jamnagar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.THAKAR, S.M.SHAH

R. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THESE revision applications between the same parties involving the same questions are with the consent of parties heard and disposed of together as they involve common questions on similar facts. In all these matters arising from interim injunctions granted by the Civil Court against the seizure of essential commodity the State Government-original defendant is the petitioner and the opponent is a licensed dealer producer of the essential commodity namely edible oil. The opponent is running two oil mills: Asha Oil Mill and Ramdevji Oil Mill. There was a search on 1-10-1982 in these Oil Mills resulting into seizure of essential commodities. Civil Suit Nos. 863 of 1982 and 864 of 1982 were filed and the ex parte interim orders were obtained on 1 Civil Misc. Appeal Nos. 130 of 1982 and 131 of 1982 were preferred before the District Court against the ex parte orders. The District Court after allowing the parties to complete the pleadings and affidavit heard the appeals on merits and dismissed the same confirming the interim relief granted by the trial Court. Division Application Nos. 472 of 1983 and 474 of 1983 are preferred by the State Government. They are admitte















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top