( 1 ) IN this Criminal Revision Application the petitioner P. I. S. Prabhudas Pandav, who at all the material times was working as the P. I. S. , mehlav Police Station, challenges the orders pronounced by the learned J. M. F. C. , petlad below application Ex. 33 in Criminal Case No. 1672 of 197 (1) (b) of the Criminal Procedure is not a condition precedent for the prosecution against him for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Secs. 325, 323, 342, 504 and 506 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances under which the present Criminal Revision application arises may be noticed thus : one Faidmiya Kadari, a practising Advocate stationed at Nadiad, had filed the above said private complaint against P. S. I. Pandav and other four Police constables for the alleged commission of the above said offences. The case of the complainant Advocate in brief is that he had filed Special Civil Suit no. 176 of 1981 before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nadiad for the plaintiff-Lallubhai Solanki and certain ad interim orders were contained therein. According to the complainant, the Clerk of the Court was appointed as a Co