SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 68

C.K.THAKKER
DINESH SHIVUBHA PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AMIT PANCHAL, P.B.MAJUMDAR, P.G.DAVAWALA

THAKKER, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed by the petitioner for an appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondent authorities to regularise his services by giving him permanent appointment in Class-IV post in the Civil Hospital, Limdi and for granting all consequential benefits flowing from the regularisation and permanent absorption on the set up of the Hospital.

( 2 ) TO appreciate the contentions raised in the petition, relevant facts may now be stated. It is the case of the petitioner that he was appointed by an order dated 15/04/1981 on purely temporary basis for a period of 29 days as a peon, in the pay scale of Rs. 196. 00 and other admissible allowances in accordance with law. It was mentioned in the said order that since the said appointment was purely temporary, his services were liable to be terminated at any time without issuing any notice. The petitioner accepted said appointment and joined the service. It appears that thereafter, various orders came to be passed for 29 days on the same line on which the first order was passed. The petitioner came to know that in Limdi and Surendranagar Government Hospital, regular appointments were to be made and he, ther











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top