SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 173

A.N.DIVECHA
Vatati Lalmohmed – Appellant
Versus
Sarfunnissa Abdulmajid – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.R.Thakkar, D.R.BHATT, J.R.Nanavati

A. N. DIVECHA, J.

( 1 ) THE decree of eviction ordered to be passed by the Appellate Bench of the small Causes Court at Ahmedabad by its judgment and order passed on 31st january 1980 in Appeal No. 30 of 1977 is under challenge in this revisional application preferred by the original tenant before this Court. Thereby the appellate Court was pleased to accept the appeal of the landlords and to set aside the judgment and the decree passed by the learned Judge of the Small Causes court (Court No. 6) at Ahmedabad on 30th November 1976 in H. R. P. Suit no. 3510 of 1972. Thereby the learned trial Judge was pleased to dismiss the suit of the landlords for possession of the rented premises.

( 2 ) THE facts giving to this revisional application move in a narrow compass. The respondents are the landlords and the petitioner is the tenant in respect of the premises involved in the litigation giving rise to this revisional application. It appears that the tenant was stated to be in possession of two rooms on the monthly rent of Rs. 11 and Rs. 5 for the bigger room and the smaller room respectively. The tenant appears to have fallen in the arrears of rent from 1st september 1969. He was, therefo













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top