SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 163

SHARAD D.DAVE
NITABEN ABHAYBHAI MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: DIPAK TRIVEDI, K.B.ANANDJIVALA, N.S.DAFTARI

DAVE, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. Deepak Trivedi, learned P. P. waives service of rule. Affidavits of the petitioners dispensed with.

( 2 ) THIS common Judgment shall govern the disposal of these two Misc. Criminal Applications, filed on behalf of the petitioners Dr. (Mrs.) Nita A. Mehta and Mahendra V. Vora, under Sec. 438 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973, for obtaining the orders in nature of Anticipatory Bail as they apprehend their arrest in connection with C. R. No. 290 of 1992 registered at c Division Police Station, Rajkot, for the alleged offence of murder.

( 3 ) THE Misc. Cri. Application No. 2311 of 1992 has been filed by Dr. (Mrs.) Nita Mehta, who happens to be the younger sister of the deceased dr. Madhuben Shah. The other petition has been filed by the applicant Mahendra vora, who happens to be the husband of yet another sister of the deceased. The much debated question, arising under the special facts and circumstances of the case is - whether, when the material collected by the Investigating agency, thus far, is clearly divisible in two distinctly separate compartments, the earlier one clearly ruling out any possibility of the involvement of the petitioners in the offen























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top