SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 208

A.N.DIVECHA
KANTILAL PUNJAJI CHAVDA – Appellant
Versus
NANUBHAI KANTILAL CHAVDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.B.PARDIWALA, S.M.VOHRA, V.D.DESAI

DIVECHA, J.

( 1 ) THE husband has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Sec. 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the (Cr. P. C. for brief) for questioning the correctness of the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Court No. 2) of the City sessions Court at Ahmedabad on 27/03/1990 in Criminal Revision application No. 40 of 1990. Thereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has accepted the wifes revisional application against the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Court No. 10) at Ahmedabad keeping her application for interim maintenance along with the main mater. It may be mentioned that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has under his impugned judgment and order awarded interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 400/ - per month to the wife.

( 2 ) THE facts giving to this revisional application are not many and not much in dispute. Respondent No. 1 herein preferred one application under sec. 125 of the Cr. P. C. claiming maintenance from the petitioner on the ground that she is lawfully married wife and she was deserted by him and he has sufficient income to maintain her and she is unable to maintain herse




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top