A.N.DIVECHA
KANTILAL PUNJAJI CHAVDA – Appellant
Versus
NANUBHAI KANTILAL CHAVDA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE husband has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Sec. 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the (Cr. P. C. for brief) for questioning the correctness of the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Court No. 2) of the City sessions Court at Ahmedabad on 27/03/1990 in Criminal Revision application No. 40 of 1990. Thereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has accepted the wifes revisional application against the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Court No. 10) at Ahmedabad keeping her application for interim maintenance along with the main mater. It may be mentioned that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has under his impugned judgment and order awarded interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 400/ - per month to the wife.
( 2 ) THE facts giving to this revisional application are not many and not much in dispute. Respondent No. 1 herein preferred one application under sec. 125 of the Cr. P. C. claiming maintenance from the petitioner on the ground that she is lawfully married wife and she was deserted by him and he has sufficient income to maintain her and she is unable to maintain herse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.