SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Guj) 301

J.N.BHATT
RATILAL AMARSHI CHAWDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.B.ANANDJIVALA, M.J.BUDDHBHATTI, S.P.DAVE

BHATT, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER herein is the original complainant who has questioned the legality of the order with regard to the disposal of muddamal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, at Morvi, in Criminal Revision application No. 24 of 1987, on 24-12-1991, by invoking the aids of the provisions of Sec. 397 read with Sec. 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 ("code" for short ).

( 2 ) A conspectus of salient and relevant facts giving birth to the present revision may shortly, be narrated at the outset with a view to appreciate the merits of the revision and the challenge against it.

( 3 ) THE petitioner had filed a Criminal complaint with Morvi Police Station, on 3-6-1985, in connection with the theft of 3 tons of pig iron, committed in his factory premises in the night of 2-6-1985 pursuant to which offence with C. R. No. 63 of 1985 was registered and investigation was commenced.

( 4 ) THE police, during the course of the investigation, had arrested one satwara Jeram as one of the two accused persons, who is respondent No. 2, herein, and co-accused Kalu Mamad could not be traced as he was absconding. On the strength of the complaint, Criminal Case No. 808 of 1985 was



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top