SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 359

J.M.PANCHAL, D.G.KARIA, A.P.RAVANI
Shailesh Textile Industries – Appellant
Versus
Chief Controlling, Revenue Authority – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.M.BHAGAT, K.C.SHAH, V.P.Shah

PANCHAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference made under Section 54 (1a) of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 (Bombay Act No. 60 of 1958) by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Gujarat State, Ahmedabad, who dismissed the revision application against the order passed by the Collector of Stamps, Surat imposing a duty of Rs. 27,191. 50 Ps. (Rupees twenty seven thousand one hundred ninety one and fifty paise) together with a penalty of Rs. 5. 00 (five) an agreement purportedly relating to deposit of title deeds, which came to the notice of the Collector of Stamps, Surat.

( 2 ) FACTS :- the applicant - M/s. Shailesh Textile Industries is a registered partnership firm and carries on business in textile through its 7 partners. The applicant-firm wanted to avail of loan and credit facilities and, therefore, approached Dena Bank, which is a corporate body and a nationalised bank under the provisions of Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as "dena Bank" for short ). On 24/08/1974, Dena Bank sanctioned a term loan of Rs. 1,10,000. 00 (Rupees one lac ten thousand only) and also an advance of Rs. 10,00,000. 00 (Rupees ten lacs) under I. D. B. I.
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top