SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Guj) 365

SHARAD D.DAVE, S.NAINAR SUNDARAM, R.K.ABICHANDANI
KHEVINABEN R. PATEL – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISHCHANDRA J. DESAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MOHIT S.SHAH, R.K.SHAH

S. NAINAR SUNDARAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is by the legal representative of the original respondent in Civil Revision application No. 1014 of 1988. The Civil Revision Application is one preferred against the judgment and decree passed by the District Court at baroda, confirming in Regular Civil Appeal No. 282 of 1982, the judgment and decree of the First Court in Rent Suit No. 1078 of 1986 instituted by the original respondent in the Civil Revision Application for eviction of the applicant in the Civil Revision Application, The respondent in this letters Patent Appeal is the applicant in the Civil Revision Application. The original respondent in the Civil Revision Application passed away on 5-2-1991. According to Mr. Mohit S. Shah, learned Counsel for the appellant, the Civil Revision Application stood abated on 7-5-1991 and the time for setting aside the abatement also expired on 6-7-1991. The appellant, on 19-9-1992, preferred Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 1575 of 1992, praying that a writ may be sent to the District Court, Baroda and the small Causes Court, Baroda, stating that the Civil Revision Application No. 1014 of 1988 has abated in May, 1991 and the int



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top