SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 180

D.G.KARIA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
BILLAH AHMAD UMARALI SHEIKH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.P.RAVAL, K.R.RAVAL, VIJAY H.PATEL

D. G. KARIA, J.

( 1 ) THIS acquittal appeal is directed against judgment and order dated September 24, 1986 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, khambhat, in Criminal Case No. 1322 of 1986, acquitting the respondents-accused for the offences punishable under Secs. 65 (a) (e) (g) and 66 (1) (b) and 81 of the bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and for the offence punishable under Sec. 20 (b) (i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, "ndps Act" ).

( 2 ) BY the charge at Exh. 6, it is alleged that at about 5-30 p. m. on January 21, 1986, the accused persons possessed Ganja weighing 210 kilograms and Charas weighing 87 grams, totally worth Rs. 1,68,206. 00, without any pass or permit and in contravention of the provisions of the Bombay Prohibition Act and NDPS Act at their house, situated at Vaghriwad, Saifibaug in Khambhat and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

( 3 ) MR. K. P. Raval, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing for the appellant- state, raised an important question of law relating to jurisdiction of the learned magistrate in trying the offence under the NDPS Act. He submitted that the learned Magistrate failed to appre










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top