SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 379

N.N.MATHUR, S.C.PATEL
PRATAPBHAI RAMABHAI SOLANKI – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,gujarat STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.S.BRAHMBHATT

B. C. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has approached this Court by filing this application under the provisions contained in the Contempt of Courts Act, inter alia alleging that the respondent-Divisional Controller, Gujarat State Road Transport corporation has not carried out the direction as per the award pronounced by the labour Court on 10-11-1994 in reference (LCN) 496 of 1989. The competent authority under the provisions contained in the Industrial Disputes Act made a reference to the Labour Court on 6-11-1989 raising industrial dispute under Sec. 10 (1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as the petitioner herein alleged that he is relieved illegally on 22-9-19~7. On appreciation of the material placed before the Labour Court the direction was given,to reinstate the petitioner herein. It was also directed that the petitioner should be paid 25% of the wages which otherwise he would have been entitled, if he was on duty

( 2 ) THIS Division Bench has, in the judgment passed on 2/08/1995 in miscellaneous Civil Application No. 1411 of 1991 (reported in J. A. Goraswa v. D. I. G. and I. G. P. , Gujarat State, 1995 (2) GLR 1666) in Spl. C. A. No. 4009 of 1991, relying on the decision o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top