SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Guj) 452

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :J.M.Panchal
HARISH ANAND - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA - Respondent
S.C.A. 3807 of 1995
Decided On : 12/04/1995

Advocates Appeared: ASHOK ARORA, B.B.NAIK, J.B.PARDIWALA, Y.F.MEHTA

Headnote:

Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3 (1) – Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Petition seeking to challenge order of detention issued by respondent order of detention was executed on - Communication which was served on petitioner at time of his detention intimated to him following grounds on which order of detention was made by respondent - IT is not in dispute that procedural requirements enjoined Constitution have been complied with by detaining authority advisory Board – Several contentions are raised in petition while assailing validity of order of detention – Held, Court was found that correct translation of order of detention was not supplied to detent, who was conversant only with Hindi language was also found that a very important word connotation whereof constituted import of charge against detent was not included in translated version of order of detention - Court set aside order of detention principle laid down in decision which is relied on by Counsel for petitioner would not be applicable to present case decision itself it has been emphasized that mere no mention of a particular word in translation by itself would not vitiate order of detention which is translated in Gujarati is produced for perusal of Court which indicates that order has been passed with a view to preventing detent from engaging in transport of smuggled goods cannot be said that incorrect translation of order of detention is supplied to the detune Gujarati translation of order of detention clearly indicates that order of detention is passed with a view to preventing detent from engaging himself in transport of smuggled goods - It is not possible to come to conclusion that very important word connotation whereof constitutes import of charge against detent is not included in translated version of order of detention – Petition dismissed(Para 27)

J. M. PANCHAL, J.

( 1 ) BY means of filing this petition under Art. 226 of the constitution, Harish Anand-detenu herein is seeking to challenge the order of detention dated January 17, 1995 issued by respondent No. 3, i. e. , Additional Chief secretary to Government of Gujarat, Home Department (Spl.), under Sec. 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 ("the Act" for short) and prays to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing his release after quashing the detention order.

( 2 ) THE order of detention was executed on January 30, 1995. The communication dated January 17, 1995 which was served on the petitioner at the time of his detention intimated to him the following grounds on which the order of detention was made by the respondent No. 3 : (i) On December 15, 1993, the vessel MSV-AL-BILAL/pbr- 273 arrived at bedi Port, Jamnagar with cargo of wet dates. The usual customs formalities were completed and cargo of wet dates was unloaded. In the meanwhile, officers of DRI received intelligence that ball bearings of foreign origin were concealed in the said vessel. Therefore, the officers of DRI and Customs, Jamnagar rummaged the said vessel on December 16, 1993. They recovered 136 packages containing ball bearings of foreign origin from the two diesel tanks fitted in the said vessel. On examination of those 136 packages 1,98,832 pieces of ball bearings of foreign origin valued at rs. 47,20,970/- were found. Further rummaging of the said vessel on December 17, 1993 resulted in recovery of 55 more packages containing ball bearings of foreign origin which were found concealed in atri (A space between two wooden planks on the border of the vessel ). On examination of those 55 packages, 24,422 pieces of ball bearings of foreign origin valued at Rs. 10,71,068. 00 were found. As Abdul wahab Issa Ker, tindel of the vessel, could not produce any valid documents for the licit import and lawful acquisition of the aforesaid 2,23,254 pieces of ball bearings of foreign origin totally valued at Rs. 57,92,038. 00, the same were seized by the officers of DRI under the reasonable belief that they were smuggled into india and were liable to be confiscated under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962. The vessel AL-BILAL was also seized for taking appropriate actions under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962. (ii) S/shri (1) Abdul Wahab Issa Ker (tindel), (2) Adam Juma Chamadia, (3) osman Ismail Shaikh, (4) Gulam Husen Umar Turk, (5) Anwar Husen Karim, (6) harun Issak Sodha, (7) Majid Zikar Modi, (8) Aziz Kasam Sameja, (9) Suleman musa Theim, (10) Junus Usman Mokha, (11) Iqbal Issa Ker, (12) Jabbar Issa Ker, (13) Eliyas Haji Hala, and (14) Abdul Ibrahim Theim were the crew members of vessel AL-BILAL at the time of its seizure. (iii) The investigation revealed that Karim Issa Ker was the owner of the vessel msv-AL-BILAL PBR-273 and his younger brother Abdul Wahab Issa Ker was the tindel of the said vessel. The said vessel had left with cargo of live-stock from tuna Port on November 23, 1993 and reached Hamriya Port on November 28, 1993. The tindel, i. e. , Abdul Wahab arranged cargo of wet dates of Jamnagar. Meanwhile, abdul Wahab Issa Ker met one Ali Raja (Jamnagarwala) at Dubai and finalised deal to smuggle ball bearings from Dubai to India on consideration of 10,000 dirhams. Ali Raja paid 7,000 Dirhams as an advance and informed tindel Abdul wahab to wait for the telephonic message after reaching Salaya. 60 packages of ball bearings were loaded in the said vessel at Hamriya Port with the help of crew of the vessel. The vessel sailed on December 2, 1993 with the cargo of wet dates as well as ball bearings. The packages of ball bearings were torn and converted into smaller packages by the crew members and the same were concealed in the diesel tank as well as in Atri. The vessel reached at Rozi Port near Jamnagar on december 14, 1993. During the usual custom formalities, the tindel declared the































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top