SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 8

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :N.N.MATHUR
RAMCHANDRA BHAGWANJI DESAI - Appellant
Versus
GULABBHAI KALIDAS DESAI - Respondent
S.C.A. 12100 of 1994
Decided On : 01/09/1996

Advocates Appeared: K.G.VAKHARIA, KALPESH ZAVERI, P.M.RAVAL, SHIRISH JOSHI

Headnote:Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Secs. 96 (1) & 97 (1) (d) - Suit before declaration of election result - No provision which prohibits maintainability under the law - Sec. 97 (1)(d) only provides for starting point of limitation with respect to election of office bearer - It does not control Sec. 96 (1) to control jurisdiction conferred on the registrar to entertain suit after result of election is declared - Observation of Supreme Court in N.P.Ponnuswamy vs. Returning Officer, AIR 1952 SC 64, that there should not be any interference in election process once it starts is with regard to scheme of election under Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 and has no reliance to election to co-operative societies - Held, so far as election dispute under the Act, touching the counstitution of society is concerned same could be entertained at any stage before and after the election held. On plain reading of Sec. 97 (1) (a), it only provides for starting point of limitation with respect to election office bearer. This does not control Sec. 96 (1) of the Act of 1961 so as to curtail jurisdiction conferred on the Registrar to entertain the suit after result of election is declared. In fact, there is the provision which prohibit maintainability of the suit prior to declaration of result of the election.[Para 6]In the case N.P. Ponnuswami Sahayyakari Mandali, Baroda, vs. Returning Officer Namakkal Constituency, reported in AIR 1952 SC 64., held that the said decision was with reference to the provisions of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 and Art. 329 (b) of the Constitution of India. It was noticed that Sec. 100 of the Act, of 1951 expressely enables all aggrieved candidate to make in his election petition filed after the election has been held the improper rejection of nomination paper or the improper acceptance of nomination paper a ground for challenging the validity of the election. The Court held that it is this scheme of election disputes which had led the Supreme Court in the aforesaid two decisions to lay down the aforesaid principle that there should not be any intereference in the election process once it starts. The Court further held that so far as the election disputes under the Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 are concerned, is touching the constitution of a society it is entertainable at any stage whether before the election is held or after the election is held.[Para 13]

N. N. MATHUR, J.

( 1 ) ). By way of this Special Civil application, the petitioner has challenged the order of the Gujarat State Cooperative Tribunal, Ahmedabad dated 30-9-1994 whereby the Tribunal has upheld the decision of the Board of nominee dated 26-8-1994 holding the petitioner - defendant Gulabbhai Kalidas Desai disqualified for contesting the election of Director in view of Rule 26 (B) of Sardar bhilwadwala Pardi Peoples Co-operative Bank Ltd. Bye-laws, hereinafter referred to as Bye-laws and Rule 19 of the Election Rules of the Society, hereinafter referred to the election Bye-laws.

( 2 ) ). The respondent No. 2 Sardar Bhilwadwala Pardi Cooperative Bank Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) is an Urban Co-operative Bank incorporated and/or deemed to be recorporated under the provisions of the Gujarat Cooperative societies Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961 ). The Bank has framed its Bye-laws which are approved and sanctioned by the Registrar of the Cooperative societies. The Bye-law 26 (A) provides that the Board of Directors of the Respondent no. 2 Board will consist of 15 Directors divided into 5 area of operation: 1/3 Directors will retire every year. The Bye-law further provides that the election of the Board of Directors will be held according to the rules framed by the Board and approved by the Registrar. The result of the election shall be declared in the Annual General meeting and till then retiring Directors will continue to function as Directors. Byelaw no. 26 (A) (2) divides the area of operations into 5 different zones viz. Pardi, vapi, Udwada, Vapi Industrial Area and Umarsadi and six seats are in Pardi constituency, 2 seats in Udwada Constituency and 1 seat in Vapi Industrial Area constituency and Umarsadi Constituency. Bye-law 26 (A) (3) provides that at every year the vacancy caused by the retiring Directors shall be filled up by the Members registered under that Constituency. The Bye-laws further provides that if the vacancies are equal to the contesting candidates, there will not be any poll but they will be declared elected at the Annual General Meeting. Bye-law No. 26 (B) provides for the qualification for the candidate, which reads as follows:"26 (B) :- A member who holds the share in his individual name, who is not younger than 21 years of age and against whom the banks dues or instalment as the principal debtor or in the capacity of surety is not outstanding, as also wherein he is a partner in a partnership firm or company has obtained the loan, and the same has not become overdue, and against whom no criminal case or cases of moral turpitude is proved and who does not have the disqualifications as mentioned in Rule 32 of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Rules, shall be qualified to become a Director of the Bank. General Manager or any Officer subordinate to him being the paid Officer or the employees of the Bank shall not be entitled to become a director of the Bank. "thus, according to Rule 26 (B) of the Bye-law an individual shareholder being a member shall be qualified if dues or instalments are due against him as debtor or in his capacity as surety or in other words default in payment of dues of instalment of the Bank either as principal debtor or as surety shall be disqualification. The period of disqualification has been provided under Rule 19 framed by the Standing committee known as Election Bye-laws which provides that the member contesting for the post of Director shall have qualifications as per the provisions of the Bye- law No. 26 (B) continuously from 31st March, till the result of the election is declared in the Annual General Meeting. English Translation of Rule 19 reads as under :"a member contesting for the post of Director shall have the qualifications as per the provisions of Bye-law No. 26 (B) continuously from 31st March, till the result of the election is declared in the General Board Meeting, and if the candidate fails to do as above, his nominati

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top