Y.B.BHATT
UNION BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SURESH BHAILAL MEHTA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Sec. 96 C. P. C. filed by the original plaintiff, challenging the judgment and decree of the dismissal of its suit, viz. , civil Suit No. 2173 of 1976, passed by the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad. The plaintiff had filed the suit against the defendants for a sum of Rs. 13,586. 75 together with costs and interest.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff averred that the first defendant-first respondent was a person who had suffered financial hardship on account of communal riots which broke out in the city of Ahmedabad in September 6, 1969, and therefore, requested the plaintiff-bank to extend to him credit facilities by way of a clean loan to continue his business activities. Accordingly, the plaintiff-bank sanctioned a loan of rs. 15,000/- and paid that sum to him on 5th December 1969. The first defendant at that time executed a demand promissory note for the said amount, an agreement of hypothecation and other documents is favour of the plaintiff-bank, and the second defendant stood as a surety and/or guarantor for the liability of the first defendant. The second defendant, therefore, executed on the same day, i. e. , 5th December 1969 a letter of guarantee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.