SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Guj) 455

D.G.KARIA, K.J.VAIDYA
NARSING RAYSING RAJPUT – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.J.BUDDHBHATTI, NIGAM R.SHUKLA

D. G. KARIA, J.

( 1 ) NARSING Raysing Rajput, who was the Police Sub- Inspector of Gram Rakshak Dal (G. R. D.) at Bhuj, at the relevant time, on his being convicted for the offences under Secs. 307 and 333 of the Indian Penal Code, has preferred the present appeal. The learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Kutchh at Bhuj, by his judgment and order under appeal, dated January 17, 1994, held the appellant-P. S. I. guilty for the offence under Sec. 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years and imposed fine of Rs. 500. 00 in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. The learned Assistant sessions Judge also found him guilty for the offence under Sec. 333 of the Indian penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500. 00, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month. The said order of conviction and sentence has been rendered by the learned assistant Sessions Judge, Kutchh at Bhuj in Sessions Case No. 17 of 1989.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution, shortly stated, is that P. W. 2, Mahmadhussen jusab, who was serving as a Driver in Motor Transport Section o



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top