SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 187

R.R.JAIN
Vasantlal Thakordas Mali – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.V.Parekh, M.R.SHAH

R. R. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) ORDER passed by Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of gujarat, Annexure. E, dated 19. 9. 1996 while exercising revisionai jurisdiction under Sec. 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (the Act for short) setting aside the order dated 11. 4. 1989, Annexure, B, passed by the competent authority in proceedings under Sec. 6 (1) of the Act, has been challenged by the petitioner by filing this petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, the land in question is owned by Hindu Undivided Family and the competent authority held that all the members of HUF as on the date of enforcement of the Act are entitled to hold one unit and accordingly, by giving effect to the total units, the holding is not declared as excess/surplus and the Form I is filed. Almost after a period of three years, the Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Gujarat, exercising suo motu revisional jurisdiction under Sec. 34 of the Act passed the impugned order Annexure E setting aside the order passed by the competent authority.

( 3 ) AS a cardinal principal, while deciding the question of vacant land/holding in case of HUF, the to





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top