R.R.JAIN
Vasantlal Thakordas Mali – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) ORDER passed by Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of gujarat, Annexure. E, dated 19. 9. 1996 while exercising revisionai jurisdiction under Sec. 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (the Act for short) setting aside the order dated 11. 4. 1989, Annexure, B, passed by the competent authority in proceedings under Sec. 6 (1) of the Act, has been challenged by the petitioner by filing this petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution.
( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, the land in question is owned by Hindu Undivided Family and the competent authority held that all the members of HUF as on the date of enforcement of the Act are entitled to hold one unit and accordingly, by giving effect to the total units, the holding is not declared as excess/surplus and the Form I is filed. Almost after a period of three years, the Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Gujarat, exercising suo motu revisional jurisdiction under Sec. 34 of the Act passed the impugned order Annexure E setting aside the order passed by the competent authority.
( 3 ) AS a cardinal principal, while deciding the question of vacant land/holding in case of HUF, the to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.