SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Guj) 546

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :M.S.Shah
MAFATLAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED - Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT GAS COMPANY LIMITED - Respondent
APPEAL FROM ORDER 457 of 1997
Decided On : 10/24/1997

Advocates Appeared: D.S.NANAVATI, S.B.VAKIL, S.N.SHELAT

Headnote:(a) Companies Act, 1956 - Secs. 111 & 111-A - Jurisdiction of Civil Court - Claim based on pre-emption of shares - Concept of free transferability of shares - Held, court can grant relief and it does not affect jurisdiction of Civil Court.

       [See Para 49]

       (b) Companies Act, 1956 - Secs. 111 & 111-A - Existence of agreement conferring right of First refusal of shares - Held, it is triable issue and can be decided after evidence.

       [See Para 49]

       (c) Companies Act, 1956 - Secs. 82 & 111-A - Concept of Free transferability of shares - Held, alleged agreement for pre-emption is not binding on defendant.

       [See Para 49]

       (d) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Temporary injunction - Adequate remedy in damages - Balance of convenience not in favour of plaintiff - Held, case for temporary injunction is not made out.

        [See Para 49]

       (e) Companies Act, 1956 - Sec. 111-A - Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Suit for restraining company from registering transfer of shares - Special Forum in Company Law Board - Held, suit is impliedly barred.

       The conclusions are as under : -

       (I)

       The jurisdiction of the Civil Court is not barred in so far as the reliefs claimed are based on the claim for pre-emption in respect of the shares in question. Whether the Court can or would grant such relief in view of the concept of free transferability of shares is a question on merits and it does not affect the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to entertain such suit.

       (II)

       The plaintiff has raised a triable question about existence or otherwise of the agreement conferring upon the plaintiff the right of first refusal in case of sale of shares by defendant No. 2 to any other party; though this finding need not be treated as a finding that the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case about existence of the agreement. All that is held at this stage is that the issue about existence of the agreement is a triable issue and it can be decided after the evidence is led.

       (III)

       In view of the concept of free transferability of shares as embodied in Secs. 82 and 111-A (2) of the Companies Act and expounded by the Supreme Court in the case of V.B. Rangaraj and followed in the case of Gujarat Coke Bottling Co., the alleged agreement for pre-emption is not binding on any of the defendants.

       (IV)

       The plaintiff has not made out any case for interim injunction against transfer of shares by defendant Nos. 2 and 8 to defendant Nos. 6 and 7 or to any party, as ultimately even if the plaintiff succeeds in the suit, it will be entitled to get damages which would be an adequate remedy. The balance of convenience is also not in favour of the plaintiff.

       (V)

       As far as the reliefs claimed by the plaintiff for permanently and temporarily restraining defendant No. 1 company from registering the transfer of shares from defendant Nos. 2 and 8 to defendant Nos. 6 and 7 are concerned, the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the present suit as the suit is impliedly barred by the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 whch create special forum in the Company Law Board for remedies as provided in Sec. 111-A of the Companies Act in respect of all special rights and obligations flowing from the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.

       [Para 49]

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the original plaintiff against the interlocutory order dated September 11, 1997 passed by the City Civil Court, ahmedabad rejecting the Notice of Motion filed by the appellant-plaintiff in Civil suit No. 3533 of 1997. In a Nutshell

( 2 ) THE subject-matter of the present suit is transfer of 3,81,000 equity shares in defendant No. 1-a Public Limited Company-Gujarat Gas Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the Company" or as "gujarat Gas") engaged in the supply and distribution of natural gas to domestic and industrial consumers in the State of gujarat. The appellant-plaintiff, which is a Company engaged in manufacturing textiles and chemicals, is a shareholder in Gujarat Gas with 49,95,325 shares amounting to about 39% of the shareholding. In all 5,00,000 shares amounting to 3. 87% of the total equity capital were sold by the plaintiff to defendant No. 2 a Foreign Institutional investor (FII) in October, 1993 and the said transfer was registered by the Company in December, 1993. Defendant No. 2 (through defendant No. 8 also an FII) thereafter sold 5,89,000 shares to defendant Nos. 6 and 7 (also FIIs) between March and november, 1996 and defendant No. 2 sold 1,19,000 shares to the plaintiff in June, 1997. Claiming a right of pre-emption, the plaintiff has filed the present suit for a decree against defendant No. 2 (FII) to execute transfer forms in respect of the suit shares (i. e. 3,81,000 shares) at the price at which defendant Nos. 2 and 8 executed transfer forms in favour of defendant Nos. 6 and 7 and in the alternative the plaintiff has prayed for a decree of Rs. 5. 25 crores by way of damages in lieu of specific performance against defendant No. 2. The plaintiff has taken out the present Notice of Motion for an interim injunction to restrain defendant No. 2 from alienating, encumbering, dealing with or creating any third party rights or selling 3,81,000 shares to any person and also to restrain defendant No. 1 (i. e. Gujarat Gas) from registering the transfer of 3,81,000 shares or any part thereof in favour of any person and has also prayed for appointment of a Receiver to take possession of the share certificates and transfer forms of the suit shares, pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit. The trial Court has dismissed the Notice of Motion. Hence, this appeal by the plaintiff.

( 3 ) BEFORE narrating the contentions urged by the learned Counsels for the parties, it is necessary to refer to the relevant dates and events in chronological order in order to appreciate the controversy between the parties. Facts

( 4 ) IN 1980, Gujarat Gas was jointly promoted by the plaintiff and defendant no. 4 Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporation-GIIC which is a Government of gujarat undertaking. The authorised share capital of Gujarat Gas is 1,28,25,000/- equity shares of Rs. 10. 00 each. As per clause 2. 20 of the Shareholders Agreement between the said promoters executed on April 23, 1991, so long as the GIIC holds 5% of the paid-up equity share capital of the Company, the plaintiff can reduce its shareholding only with the prior written consent of the GIIC and to such person/ s, Companies, institutions acceptable to the GIIC, provided that before offering the shares to any other person, the plaintiff shall offer the shares to the GIIC and in case of acceptance of the offer by the GIIC, the price of the shares shall be determined as per the formula provided in the agreement. Liberty was, however, reserved to the plaintiff to sell and/or to transfer the shares to any of its subsidiaries or any member of the plaintiff group under intimation to the GIIC and such transferees would also be bound to abide by the Shareholders Agreement. Article 33 of the Articles of the Association of the Company provides :". . . . . . . . No transfer of shares shall be registered in violation of Shareholders Agreement dated April 23, 1991 between the GIIC and the MIL (plaintiff) so long as the sa






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top