SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 85

D.C.SRIVASTAVA
Khumansing Adesing – Appellant
Versus
Nanabhai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, JITENDRA M.PATEL

D. C. SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs Second Appeal.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs filed Suit for redemption of mortgage on the allegation that their deceased father owned agricultural land. Deceased Adesing Vazir was in need of money. He executed a mortgage deed on 3. 12. 1996 in favour of deceased Nanabhai Vaghjibhai, deceased father of the plaintiff, for Rs. 699/ -. The mortgagee agreed to reconvey the property on repayment of Rs. 699/ -. These two transactions are contained in one document Ex. 28 dated 3. 12. 1996. The plaintiffs alleged that Nanahhai Vaghjibhai was requested to accept Rs. 6997- and reconvey the property, hut he refused to do so. According to the plaintiff the mortgage deed is a mortgage by conditional sale and since the defendants refused to reconvey the mortgaged property hence the Suil was filed by the plaintiff.

( 3 ) THE Suit was resisted by defendant on the ground that it was time barred and that the document was not mortgage by conditional sale. According to them it is a document in the nature of sale with condition to repurchase. Agreement of reconveyance was denied. It is also denied that the amount was offered within five years which was refused. It wa




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top