SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 129

R.BALIA
ANILKUMAR RADHESHYAM TULSIAN – Appellant
Versus
SURAT MUNICIPAL corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ARUN H.MEHTA, PRASHANT DESAI

R. BALIA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants have filed Special Civil Suit No. 22 of 1998 in the Court of Second Joint Civil Judge (S. D.), Surat District, for permanent injunction against the respondent Surat-Municipal Corporation restraining them from interfering with the construction which is being carried out by the plaintiffs in the property in question, and to restrain from demolishing the construction on the suit property. According to the plaintiff the land in question which is situated within the municipal limits of Surat Municipal Corporation is covered by draft town planning scheme published under the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976. For the development of the area of which the land in question is a part, State Government has constituted Surat Urban Development Authority under S. 22 of the Gujarat town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976. As the permission of appropriate authority before carrying out any development of the area was a condition precedent under S. 26 of the Town Planning Act, the plaintiffs applied under S. 27 of the act and they are carrying out the construction as per the plans approved by the Surat urban Development Authority under the Ac




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top