SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 202

K.SREEDHAR RAO, ANIL R.DAVE
KHERALU NAGARIK SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.G.VAKHARIA, M.K.VAKHARIA, PRASHANT DESAI, S.N.SHELAT, TUSHAR MEHTA

K. SREEDHARAN, J.

( 1 ) THE common question raised in all these Special Civil applications is relating to Constitutional validity of S. 71 of the Co-operative societies Act, Gujarat Act 10 of 1962 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ). Contention is that S. 71 cannot in any manner control the affairs of a Society, engaged in banking business. Such a Society, after the amendment brought about by the Banking Laws (Application to Co-operative Societies) Act. Central Act 23 of 1965, cannot have any relevance to such activities. On account of the said Central legislation, the provisions contained in the Act becomes ultra vires the powers of the State Legislature by virtue of provisions contained in Art. 245 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) LEARNED Counsels appearing in the case, while arguing the entire issue in detail, agreed to have all these petitions disposed of by a common judgment. They further prayed that this Court need not go into various questions of fact raised in these matters, for, they are to be challenged before the Authorities, who issued notices, requiring the Bank and its officers to show cause why action contemplated by S. 147 of the Act are not to be initiated. On this ba








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top