SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 234

ANIL R.DAVE, K.SREEDHAR RAO
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
SAVITABEN MADHUKAR MAKIWANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, K.S.JAVERI, PRASHANT DESAI

A. R. DAVE, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-Government has questioned validity of the judgment delivered in Special Civil Application No. 1565 of 1997 dated 25th July 1997 [reported in 1998 (1) GLR 321] whereby the learned single Judge has quashed and set aside order dated 12th February 1997 passed by appellant No. 1-Government under provisions of S. 263 (1) of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) whereby Kalol Municipality was superseded by the appellant- government. Parties in the appeal have been described as arrayed in the petition for the sake of convenience.

( 2 ) KALOL Municipality, respondent No. 3 in the petition, was superseded by respondent No. 1-Government, by an order dated 12th February 1997 and, therefore, the petitioners, some of the Councillors of Kalol Municipality, had challenged the order of supersession. The petitioners had mainly submitted before the learned single judge in Special Civil Application No. 1565 of 1997 that the impugned order of supersession was unjust, illegal and was passed without any application of mind. The said order was also alleged to be violative of principles of natural. It was submitted by the petitioners tha




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top