SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 257

S.M.SONI, J.R.VORA
KANTILAL KALIDASBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.J.SETHNA, S.R.DIVETIA

S. M. SONI, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants (appellant No. 1 now deceased) have filed this appeal challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 27th June, 1991 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, Court No. 16 holding the appellants guilty of offence punishable under Sec. 302 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian penal Code and sentenced each of them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 500. 00 in default rigorous imprisonment for two months.

( 2 ) PRECISELY stated, the case of the prosecution is as under : the appellants ("accused" for short) had deposited Rs. 75,000. 00 with the deceased. The said amount was not paid back despite repeated demands. In the evening of 9th July, 1990, accused had gone to the residence of the deceased hareshbhai and pressed the demand for the said amount. As the deceased denied to pay the same, accused No. 1 caught hold of the deceased and accused No. 2 inflicted knife blows. Deceased fell down. By that time, some of the neighbours of the deceased rushed to the scene of offence. One of them telephoned to Navrangpura police Station where one Rupaji Ramaji, PW 10, was on duty as Police Station officer received the telepho



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top