M.S.SHAH
JIVIBEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition purporting to be a petition under Art. 226 of the constitution read with Art. 227 of the Constitution challenges the judgment and order dated 24-3-1998 passed by the State Government in Revision Application No. SRD/ con/ahmedabad/12 of 1995 under the provisions of the Bombay Prevention of fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ).
( 2 ) THE petitioner sold the land in question admeasuring 1 Acre and 2 Gunthas to respondent No. 3 herein by a registered sale deed dated 16-10-1978. The mutation entry to that effect being entry No. 1491 was made in the revenue record on 20-12-1978 and was certified on 8-10-1979. R. T. S. team was of the view that the land in question was a fragment and, therefore, the proceedings were initiated by the Deputy Collector on 13-6-1993. The Deputy Collector held by order dated 30-6-1993 that the land in question was a fragment and the transaction in question was in violation of Sec. 7 of the Act and was, therefore, void as per Sec. 9 of the act. The matter was carried in revision before the Government which remanded the matter for holding a detailed inquiry on the question
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.