SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 525

S.K.KESHOTE
Bhupendra Steel – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Export – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.J.SHELAT, D.C.DAVE, K.S.Nanavati, Vimal Patel

S. K. KESHOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal from order is directed against the order dated 11th August, 1998 passed by the learned Chamber Judge, Court No. 18, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, below Exh. 5 (notice of motion) in Civil Suit No. 3266 of 1998 whereunder the ad-interim relief granted by the Trial Court earlier has been vacated.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel, for the parties do not dispute that the application Exh. 5 was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code ). So this appeal is under Sec. 104 read with Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of the Code.

( 3 ) GRANT of interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code is discretionary and-equitable relief, though the discretion is to be exercised judiciously. An appeal against discretionary order or order of equitable relief under Sec. 104 read with Order 41 rule l (r) of the Code is an appeal against interlocutory discretionary order, and an order passed in equitable jurisdiction, and the powers of the appellate Court in such appeal are not as wide as are of the appellate Court in a regular appeal against decree. Appellate court hearing appeal under Sec. 104 read with Order 41 Rule




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top