SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Guj) 743

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, M.S.SHAH
GUJARAT KHET KAMDAR UNION – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, H.M.MEHTA, KETAN DAVE, S.B.VAKIL

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THESE petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution are directed against the common judgment and order dated 13-4-1992 of the Gujarat Revenue tribunal, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") in Revision application Nos. 45, 46 and 47 of 1989 under Sec. 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ).

( 2 ) SPECIAL Civil Application No. 686 of 1994 is filed as a public interest petition by the Gujarat Khet Kamdar Union challenging the interpretation placed by the tribunal on certain provisions of the Act which had a bearing on the prohibition against the absentee landlords and for a writ of mandamus to direct the State government to take appropriate action under Sec. 84c of the Act against the absentee landlords and to take possession of such lands and to distribute the same to the landless labourers. The petitioner-Union claims to represent agricultural labourers, most of whom are landless, including small and marginal farmers, who on account of small size of holding have to toil as labourers elsewhere. The petitioner-Union also claims to be working for the protection of socio-economic rights of the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top