SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 216

M.R.CALLA, R.P.DHOLAKIA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
ADMINISTRATIVE OF LALJI MAHARAJ,harisinh RAMSINH RAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.V.SHETH, P.B.BHATT, P.G.DESAI, SAURAV AMIN

M. R. CALLA, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of 27 First Appeals filed by the State of Gujarat, Special Land Acquisition Officer (Narmada Project) and Executive Engineer (Narmada Project) as appellants, is directed against the order dated 10th May, 1996 passed by the Assistant Judge, Bharuch as Reference Court in Land Acquisition Reference Cases Nos. 844/88 to 846/88 (3), 848/88 to 850/88 (3), 1192/98 to 1204/88 (13), 1206/88 to 1211/88 (6) and 1213/88 to 1214/88 (2); the main Land Reference Cases being Nos. 844/88 to 846/88. The learned counsel for the appellants in all these appeals have challenged the impugned order dated 10th May, 1996 passed by the Reference Court on the following grounds: (1) The Reference Court has erred in awarding the interest on solatium; (2) The Reference Court has erred in deducting only 25 per cent of the value of the crop whereas it should have deducted 50 per cent towards the value of the crop in view of the observations made in the case of State of Gujarat Vs. Rama Rana reported in AIR 1997 Supreme Court 1845 (para 4); and (3) The Reference Court erred in applying the multiplier of 12. 5 instead of 10 while granting the compensation.

( 2 ) IT has been given out










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top