SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Guj) 425

A.M.KAPADIA
CADBURY INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
S. M. DYECHEM LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.S.VAKIL, D.C.DAVE, MIHIR J.THAKOR, S.B.VAKIL, S.M.THAKORE

A. M. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT, Cadbury India Limited, having lost the legal battle against respondent SM Dyechem Limited in the lower Court, has knocked the doors of this Court by filing this Appeal from Order with the aids of the provisions of Order 43 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code (the Code for short), whereunder it challenged the order dated 23. 3. 1999 recorded below Ex. 6 - Notice of Motion - in Civil Suit No. 852 of 1999, by learned Chamber Judge, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, whereby he granted injunction against the appellant in terms of para 21 (A) and (B) of the application restraining the appellant from infringing the respondents trade mark "piknik" which is registered under the provisions of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (the Act for short hereinafter) vide trade mark No. 505532 and to pass off the appellants goods i. e. , chocolate, chocolate preparations, wafer biscuits and/or the like goods as and for that of respondents, till the disposal of the suit.

( 2 ) PRESENT appellant is the original defendant whereas present respondent is the original plaintiff and hence for the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties are hereinafter referred to as the pl














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top